The Delhi High Court in Himanshu vs University of Delhi & others dismissing the petition denied migration request of petitioner-student for delay in filing application and also held that migration was not a vested right to be claimed in such a circumstance.
Delhi High Court in Association of MD Physicians vs National Board of Examination directed the respondent, National Board of Examination (NBE) to treat an erroneous question which appeared in the Foreign Medical Graduates Examination (FMGE), conducted in December 2020, as deleted and to award an extra mark to candidates who were assessed as having given an incorrect answer to the disputed question.
Delhi High Court in Master Akash Yadav Minor Vs Union of India -W.P.(C) 8520/2021- upheld the Medical Council of India (MCI) Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 while rejecting the petitioner’s prayer to alter the minimum age to appear for NEET 2021 from 17 years to 15 years.
The Delhi High Court in Dr. Akant Pandey vs The National Board of Examination & Anr held that where the petitioner had already exceeded the maximum number of attempts of Diplomate of National Board (DNB) final examination and therefore cannot be further given a chance to attempt examination.
Delhi High Court in Janardan Sharma vs GNCT of Delhi Through its Chief Secretary & Ors. [WP(C) no. 11154 of 2019] pronounced that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 “does not draw a distinction between a fulltime employee / a part time employee / ad hoc employee etc.” and directed the respondents to pay gratuity to the petitioner, a retired part-time vocational teacher.
The Delhi High Court clubbing two writ petitions pertaining to the same matter in Yatendra Singh Vs Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences (IGIPESS) & Anr and Vivek Vats Vs Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences & Anr., held that the petitioners should not suffer owing to the respondent institutes fallacious merit list and were entitled to continue their course without any disturbance.
Delhi High Court Tapasya Shiksha Samiti V. Union of India and Ors — W.P.(C)-9368/2020, deemed its interference unwarranted where the petitioner college had failed to submit consent of affiliation within the stipulated time to the Ministry of AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy) resulting in the rejection of permission in establishing a college by the Union of India (UOI).
The High Court of Delhi in Riddhima Singh (Minor) through…. v. CBSE and Ors. directed the school to promote the appellant on merits subject to the deposit of fees and charges while commenting that the presence of CBSE as a respondent is not enough to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226.
The Delhi High Court taking cognizance of petition by National Federation of the Blind, who have been asked to appear for the Online Examinations of the Delhi University has directed UGC, Central Government and the Delhi University to consider their grievances and find a solution for such blind students.
The High Court of Delhi in The British School Society vs The British International School – IA 15651/2021- held that two educational institutions cannot have identical names that leads to confusion among students and parents.